Yeardley
Love, days away from graduating from the University of Virginia, was killed in
2010 by her ex-boyfriend George Huguely. Both were 22; both were lacrosse
players.
He was drunk, pissed off, and came to her
apartment where she lay sleeping. He kicked the door in, beat her head against
the wall, and then stole her computer – apparently to keep the threatening
emails he’d sent her from seeing the light of day.
He
was convicted of second-degree murder and grand larceny. Yesterday he was
sentenced to 23 years in prison. With good behavior and including time served,
he could be out in as little as 18 years.
As
in so many domestic or dating violence scenarios, Yeardley did nothing to
provoke the violence that ended her life. She was sleeping in bed when she was
attacked by the man with whom she had ended a relationship.
The
defense argued that George didn’t intend to kill her (despite his messages to
her to do just that), but that she died because she suffocated in the pillow.
Never mind that she wouldn’t have died at all if not for the savage beating
George gave her. Never mind that George traveled from his apartment to hers,
had to kick down the door to gain entry, and then beat her while she was
asleep.
Yeardley
Love’s parents are suing George Huguely personally, as well as the University
of Virginia. Could her death have been prevented had the University acted
against George Huguely in 2009, when he accosted another lacrosse player while
George was drunk?
Clearly
he had a problem handling alcohol. He also had anger issues, and his
relationship with Yeardley was called volatile by friends. The norm is that
most abusers do not serve much jail time unless they kill someone.
The
US Senate has passed the Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization bill, S.1925. Congress is considering a version that does not protect all domestic
violence/sexual assault survivors. Do they consider that some survivors did not
have “legitimate” assaults, and so are undeserving of services?
Violence
against women crosses all boundaries of race, class, ethnicity, religion,
political belief, and marital status. Worldwide, one in three women will be
experience some form of domestic violence; compare that to breast cancer, which
affects one in eight women.
The
question isn’t why did Yeardley Love stay in a volatile relationship with
George Huguely. The question is why did he lash out in violence? We need to put
the onus on the perpetrator, not the victim.
We
need to make violence against women a national conversation, in the way Betty
Ford first made breast cancer a national conversation. We need to bring it out
of the closet and stop blaming the victim. We need to address the abusers,
provide services to the victims, and stop the cycle of violence by educating
the children.
Does
the 23 year sentence Huguely received mean that Yeardley received justice? Yes,
in the sense that her killer was caught, tried, and sentenced to a prison term.
No, in the sense that had Huguely received intervention at some point in his
career as an abuser her death might have been prevented.
The
answer isn’t to punish the killers of women; it is to stop the violence against
them from happening in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment